The Bitcoin (BTC) bull market has put the flagship cryptocurrency on par with cyclical assets as opposed to a hedge against market stress, according to analysts at JPMorgan Chase.
JPMorgan strategists John Normand and Federico Manicardi say anyone betting on Bitcoin as a portfolio diversifier is putting themselves at risk. In a Thursday report obtained by Bloomberg, the strategists called Bitcoin the “least reliable hedge during periods of acute market stress.”
They added:
“The mainstreaming of crypto ownership is raising correlations with cyclical assets, potentially converting them from insurance to leverage.”
Cyclical assets typically refer to stocks that follow the trend in the overall economy, which means their performance depends on the business cycle. These companies produce goods and services that are in demand when the economy is performing well. Consequently, these are some of the first items people forego when the economy weakens.
Cyclical stocks include companies in the restaurant, hospitality, airline, furniture, automobile and other discretionary industries.
While seemingly arguing against Bitcoin’s “digital gold” narrative, the strategists acknowledged that the cryptocurrency may be suitable for investors worried about policy shocks and the systemic devaluation of fiat currencies.
In that vein, their views seem to diverge from fellow JPMorgan strategists led by Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou who believe that Bitcoin is drawing investors away from precious metals. As Cointelegraph reported last month, Panigirtzoglou and colleagues argue that only a small reallocation from gold to Bitcoin would generate “structural” headwinds for the precious commodity.
They said at the time:
“The adoption of bitcoin by institutional investors has only begun, while for gold, its adoption by institutional investors is very advanced. If this medium to longer-term thesis proves right, the price of gold would suffer from a structural headwind over the coming years.”
Against the backdrop of these competing views, Bitcoin remains a highly volatile asset. The cryptocurrency more than doubled in price over a three-week period, going from $20,000 to nearly $42,000, before seeing a pullback in bullish momentum earlier this month. It has since corrected roughly $10,000 from its all-time high, including a 20% drop over the past seven days.
Shark Tank Investor Shifts Portion of Portfolio To Bitcoin and Ethereum
Published
47 mins ago
on
March 1, 2021
By
Although Bitcoin couldn’t hold above the $1 trillion market cap for very long, doing so in the first place might have been a turning point for even the most skeptical investors. It has even caused one Shark Tank investor to change his tune, shifting a portion of his portfolio into the highly volatile asset. Here’s how else the cryptocurrency asset class has been able to turn other high-wealth investors from naysayers into believers.
ABC’s Shark Tank Investor Kevin O’Leary Allocates 3% Into Bitcoin And Ethereum
Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum are extremely volatile compared to traditional asset counterparts. That volatility has kept Shark Tank investor Kevin O’Leary from making a bid on the asset class for years, aside from a small purchase he made on Coinbase in 2017.
RELATED READING | ONE YEAR LATER: BITCOIN EMERGES AS “THE STIMULUS ASSET”
Over the last few years, the affectionally-dubbed “Mr. Wonderful” has appeared on CNBC blasting the asset class as “garbage,” but he’s now bought into weighted bucket of Bitcoin and Ethereum with at least 3% of his portfolio, according to a recent segment.
O’Leary says that the volatility the asset class is notorious for still “sickens” him, but that he’s “getting used to it” and thinks that crypto is “here to stay.”
The rise of Bitcoin and Ethereum over the last year has been undeniable | Source: BTCUSD on TradingView.com
Crypto Wins Over Mr. Wonderful, What Happens When The Feeding Frenzy Begins?
O’Leary is a mainstay on ABC’s Shark Tank, alongside other wealthy entrepreneurs and investors such as Robert Herjavec, Lori Grenier, and Mark Cuban. Cuban, another crypto pundit who once said he’d rather have bananas than Bitcoin, has also recently come around to the asset class.
Cuban hasn’t necessarily given much support to Bitcoin itself, but has recently dabbled in NFTs in recent months.
RELATED READING | FAMED INVESTOR, BLACK SWAN AUTHOR IS “GETTING RID OF” HIS BITCOIN, HERE’S WHY
Bitcoin and Ethereum, have grown enormously in ROI, market cap, and adoption. The pandemic and resulting stimulus-related money printing propelled the digitally scarce asset with futuristic, decentralized use cases into the forefront of finance, and since then, no one can deny their relevancy and potential.
With that widespread realization that these technologies are “here to stay” as O’Leary said, there’s a mad dash to buy in now rather than paying increasingly higher prices later on. High wealth individuals like O’Leary, whose net worth is reportedly around $400 million are only just starting to allocate 3% of their portfolios and look what how much the asset’s price has appreciated.
What will the result be when large portfolios are crypto-dominant? It is a future that’s hard to imagine for the time being, but as the asset class has shown its transformative potential has nowhere nearly been tapped, and is only just beginning to show what it is capable of.
Featured image from Deposit Photos, Charts from TradingView.com
More Bitcoin! Michael Saylor’s MicroStrategy just keeps buying BTC
Published
2 hours ago
on
March 1, 2021
By
MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin (BTC) buying spree shows no signs of slowing, after CEO Michael Saylor announced the purchase of another 328 BTC on Monday. The acquisition, which was paid for in cash, cost the firm around $15 million, and equated to an average coin price of $45,710 at the time of purchase.
The investment takes MicroStrategy’s total Bitcoin holdings to 90,859 coins — a haul worth $4.3 billion based on the current coin price. The firm essentially dollar-cost-averaged into Bitcoin over the course of the past five months, leaving the average price of each of its Bitcoin purchases at $24,063 per coin. Saylor tweeted on March. 1:
MicroStrategy has purchased an additional ~328 bitcoins for ~$15.0 million in cash at an average price of ~$45,710 per #bitcoin. As of 3/1/2021, we #hodl ~90,859 bitcoins acquired for ~$2.186 billion at an average price of ~$24,063 per bitcoin. $MSTRhttps://t.co/fGH5KacsPI
The firm first acquired Bitcoin in August 2020 when it made an initial $250 million outlay on 21,454 coins. MicroStrategy continued to buy more BTC at various points towards the end of 2020, eventually accumulating over 70,000 coins by the turn of the year.
In February the business intelligence firm announced that it would raise an additional $900 million for further Bitcoin purchases — a sum which eventually exceeded $1 billion when an additional 19,452 coins were purchased on Feb. 24.
MicroStrategy’s total outlay on Bitcoin stands at $2.18 billion, while current coin prices would value the firm’s holdings at $4.3 billion, meaning the firm would have made over $2 billion in five months were it to sell. However, there is little reason to suggest this will happen any time soon. Saylor previously said buying Bitcoin was one of the firm’s two corporate goals, along with growing its analytics software business.
Tether hit with 500 Bitcoin ransom demand — but says it won’t pay
Published
3 hours ago
on
March 1, 2021
By
Hackers have threatened to release sensitive company documents supposedly belonging to USDT stablecoin issuer Tether unless the firm sends a 500 Bitcoin (BTC) ransom to a specified address.
As revealed by the official Twitter account for Tether on Feb. 28, hackers purportedly threatened to leak documents that would “harm the Bitcoin ecosystem” if their ransom demands are not met. Tether has already stated that it will not pay the ransom, which amounts to a dollar value of $23.8 million at the time of publication. The firm tweeted:
“Today we also received a ransom demand for 500 BTC to be sent to bc1qa9f60pved3w3w0p7snpxlnh5t4uj95vxn797a7. The sender said that, unless they receive the BTC by tomorrow, they will leak documents to the public in an effort to “harm the bitcoin ecosystem.” We are not paying.”
The firm said the extortionists’ motivations weren’t clear, noting that it could be a simple cash grab or part of a greater effort to undermine Tether and the rest of the Bitcoin ecosystem.
“It is unclear whether this is a basic extortion scheme like those directed at other crypto companies or people looking to undermine Tether and the crypto community as a whole. Either way, those seeking to harm Tether are getting increasingly desperate,” the firm tweeted.
Tether may have assumed the worst of its troubles were behind it after reaching a settlement in the landmark case launched against the company by the Office of the New York Attorney General. Putting an end to the legal uncertainty surrounding Tether in the past few years, the firm was ordered to pay an $18.5 million fine and to submit regular reports of its reserves. The firm stressed that it had admitted to no wrong-doing in the wake of the judgment by the New York court.
On Feb. 28, Tether warned customers that forged documents were circulating on the internet which alleged to be genuine communications between Tether and representatives of the Deltec Bank and Trust
“PSA: Forged documents are circulating online purporting to be between @tether_to personnel and reps of Deltec Bank & Trust and others. The documents are bogus.”
The tweet and Twitter account from which the documents were posted have since been deleted, although peripheral discussion surrounding the posts can still be found on Reddit.
Now Tether will seek help from authorities regarding what it deems to be a “pretty sad shakedown attempt.” A tweet from the company stated:
“While we believe this is a pretty sad attempt at a shakedown, we take it seriously. We have reported the forged communications and the associated ransom demand to law enforcement. As always, we will fully support law enforcement in an investigation of this extortion scheme.”
The deadline by which Tether was ordered to pay the 500 BTC ransom has since passed. Cointelegraph contacted Tether to find out if any further developments had taken place and this article will be updated should we receive a reply.